3D Face Verification vs. 2D Face Recognition: Which One is Right for Modern Security Needs?

The evolution of face scanning technology has evolved massively since the first introduction of phone face scanning biometric unlocking. When this technology first became available, people were drawn in by the convenience of just looking at your phone to unlock it. Now in 2025, companies are a little more concerned about the security functions behind the face scanning, instead of just seeing who can unlock their devices quicker. The major advancement has been moving from flat 2D to 3D Face Verification technology. A good analogy would be the evolution of movies. Imagine watching a 2-D movie, and then seeing a 3D movie, and understanding how much more a 3-D movie captures, and the interactivity level of the experience. So too in the rapidly growing competition landscape of 3D versus 2D Face Recognition technology, the competition is now being defined by the emerging clear victor, which is 3D, in accuracy, and security.

Read more about the 3D face recognition

Understanding 2D Face Recognition Technology

Most users are familiar with 2D face recognition, It’s what you’ve got on your phone – basically just matching your face to a stored photo.

This technology operates by capturing standard digital images and analyzing facial features to create a unique template. According to research, 2D systems rely on mathematical models that extract information from images, focusing on nodal points like the distance between eyes or nose size.

Sure, it works fine when everything’s perfect, but try using it:

• In a dark room

• Wearing different glasses

• After a haircut

• When you’re not holding your phone at just the right angle

The problem with 2D face scanning is that it’s just not that reliable in real life. (NIST FRVT). Even government testing shows it can be pretty hit or miss. According to the NIST Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT), these systems can exhibit varying performance metrics. Reports highlighting that both the false acceptance rate (FAR) and false rejection rate (FRR) can be problematic under certain conditions. Particularly in environments with changing lighting and angles. For example, they’ll let in someone who isn’t supposed to get in, and other times they won’t recognize people who should have access. It’s especially bad when the lighting isn’t perfect or if someone isn’t standing at just the right angle.

Exploring 3D Face Verification Technology

Conversely, 3D face verification is truly a major advancement. This technology utilizes various imaging methods (for example, stereoscopic cameras and laser scanners) to build a three-dimensional model of a face. 3D face verification creates a 3D computer model of the face, and when combined with depth mapping can help to verify a person’s identity under changing conditions.

3D Systems have very impressive accuracy rates, showing a false acceptance rate of as low as 0.0005% and false rejection rate of only 0.1%. This means that 3D systems can still provide useful identification capability when part of the face is blocked or when the user wears a face mask, which has become increasingly important worldwide during public health pandemic events.

Looking to the Future

The future of digital identity verification solutions appears firmly rooted in 3D systems. Recent advancements have led to sensors capable of processing faces in milliseconds, even in low-light conditions. As technology continues to improve and become more affordable, organizations are encouraged to consider transitioning sooner rather than later. The question is no longer whether organizations should adopt 3D face verification but rather when and how they should implement it. As evidenced by numerous successful transitions across various sectors, those who embrace this technology are likely to enhance their security measures significantly while improving user experiences.